Industrial AI & Decision Systems

Your data.
Your operations.
Actual answers.

From fragmented data to better operating and capital decisions.

We design and deploy systems that connect enterprise data, automate governed workflows, and combine AI with engineering, operational, and financial analysis. Built for industrial environments where decisions must be traceable and the economics have to hold.

PhD chemical engineering. Chicago Booth MBA. Senior industrial operator and former Silicon Valley CEO. Credible in the architecture review and the board meeting.

Integrated
Data, documents and APIs
Traceable
Sources, assumptions and outputs
Decision-led
Engineering, operations and economics
Your stack
Cloud, hybrid or local

Your systems hold the data.
Your teams still assemble the decision.

Industrial businesses rarely lack data. They lack a reliable path from ERP records, operating systems, documents, models, and external sources to an answer that can survive technical and financial review.

Operating, commercial, and technical data sit in separate systems. Analysts rebuild the same joins and reconciliations for every decision.
Create a governed integration layer that makes the source, transformation, and current state visible.
Staff classify documents, check eligibility, route work, and compile reports by hand. Exceptions appear late and audit trails are incomplete.
Automate the repeatable path, preserve human judgment, and route exceptions with a complete operating record.
Engineering assumptions, policy incentives, commodity exposure, and capital structure live in different models with no common decision frame.
Connect the technical basis to economics, risk, and stage-gate decisions in one traceable system.

AI is not the right tool for every problem. The objective is a working decision system, whether the right method is rules, optimization, retrieval, computer vision, statistical modeling, or a combination.

AI is one component.
The decision is the product.

A useful system connects source data, operating rules, domain models, and workflow controls to a decision someone owns. It shows where the answer came from, what assumptions govern it, and where human review belongs.

We use retrieval, agents, computer vision, optimization, geospatial analysis, and conventional software where each method fits. The architecture follows the business problem, not a preferred tool.

Sources
ERP & databasesDocuments & emailAPIs & sensors
↓
Integrate
Ingest & normalizePermissionsData contracts
↓
Analyze
Rules & optimizationModels & RAGScenario analysis
↓
Decide
Workflow actionException reviewExecutive view

What we build

Outcome-led systems from architecture through production deployment, built around the decision, workflow, and control environment.

01 /

Enterprise Data Integration

Connect operating, technical, and financial data without replacing the systems that run the business.

Governed pipelines across ERP records, databases, APIs, documents, and external sources. Common data models make transformations, permissions, and refresh status explicit.

ERP · SQL · APIs Documents & email Data contracts
02 /

Workflow & Compliance Automation

Reduce manual handling while preserving control points, exceptions, and an audit trail.

Eligibility checks, document processing, dispatch, reporting, approvals, and alerts. Rules and AI handle the repeatable path; accountable people retain judgment.

Rules & routing Human review Audit records
03 /

Knowledge Systems

Make technical archives and institutional knowledge searchable, cited, and usable in the workflow.

Retrieval-augmented generation, multimodal search, and source-aware interfaces over private documents and data. Evaluation and access controls are designed with the system.

RAG & search Citations Multimodal data
04 /

Industrial Analytics & Decision Models

Connect process performance, incentives, market exposure, and capital economics.

Reproducible engineering and financial models for project development, operating choices, scenario boundaries, and investment gates.

Optimization Scenario analysis CI & incentives
05 /

Operational Intelligence

Surface the event that requires action, not another dashboard someone must watch.

Scheduled monitoring, exception scoring, geospatial screening, alerts, and management views that turn changing external and internal data into an owned response.

Monitoring Geospatial Alerts & dashboards
06 /

Secure Deployment & Handoff

Fit the system to customer infrastructure, access, logging, and lifecycle requirements.

Cloud, VPC, hybrid, or local architectures that support customer security controls. Deployment includes monitoring, documentation, source code, and a defined operating owner.

IAM & SSO patterns Observability Documented ownership

Three situations where we fit

The strongest fit is a material decision or recurring workflow where fragmented evidence, operating judgment, and economic consequence meet.

Recurring operating workflow

Manual reconciliation has become part of the process

Orders, eligibility rules, operating data, documents, and reports cross systems. Analysts rebuild joins or route exceptions manually. We connect the sources, automate the standard path, and preserve accountable review.

Project development & investment

A capital decision spans engineering and economics

Process design, carbon intensity, infrastructure, incentives, commodity exposure, and financing assumptions live in separate models. We connect them to stage-gate scenarios and investment decisions.

Regulated evidence & reporting

The answer must survive technical or commercial review

Eligibility, emissions, compliance, or incentive claims depend on source records and reproducible logic. We build traceable calculations and controlled reporting for operating, management, and diligence review.

Selected systems, working in production

Case Study 01

Seventeen years of fragmented community knowledge, made usable as a source-linked research system.

This independent community project preserves a biochar research archive spanning five email groups, technical attachments, field reports, and images. The material was valuable but fragmented across long threads, inconsistent terminology, and disconnected media.

The production system supports meaning-based and multilingual questions across text, images, and PDF pages while retaining links to the original messages and discussion context. The technical case study documents the evidence boundary, retrieval design, measured runtime, and operating-cost basis.

01 /Archive sources
02 /Normalize and trace
03 /Embed and index
04 /Retrieve with citations
FAISS SQ8 · MBOX ingestion Multimodal embeddings Multimodal retrieval GCP · FastAPI · Streamlit Multilingual queries
17+ yrs
Community knowledge
5
Source groups unified
Text + media
One search path
Source-linked
Original context retained
Multilingual
Question handling
Production
Monitored runtime
Case Study 02

Eligibility, dispatch, and reporting across 83 active municipal program codes, connected in production.

An organics operator needed to apply address-specific municipal program rules at checkout, then move each approved order through dispatch and reporting. Customer-entered city names alone could not distinguish incorporated jurisdictions from eligible unincorporated areas.

The anonymized production platform uses geocoding and authoritative boundary data to validate eligibility, 83 active coupon codes to apply program rules, workflow orchestration to generate and route dispatch records, and a reporting service over Firestore event data. Three independently deployed services preserve operating traceability and limit failure domains.

01 /Address and order
02 /Geocode
03 /Validate eligibility
04 /Route dispatch
05 /Record events
Python · FastAPI Google Cloud Run Geospatial validation Firestore Microsoft Graph Power Automate
83
Active program codes
3
Production services
Checkout
Point of validation
Geo
Jurisdiction logic
Dispatch
Controlled routing
Events
Reporting record

How we engage

Each engagement follows explicit decision gates. Work can stop after assessment if the economics or evidence do not support implementation.

Initial engagement

Decision Workflow Assessment

Paid · Typically 4-6 weeks

A bounded engagement focused on one material decision or workflow. We map the current state, quantify the economic stakes, inspect evidence and control constraints, and identify the least-complex intervention that can materially improve the outcome. Company-wide adoption and implementation remain separate decisions.

01 / AccessGoverned knowledge
02 / AutomateExisting workflow
03 / RedesignDecision process
04 / StopNo technology investment

Decision brief

  • Current-state workflow and decision map
  • Value, feasibility, data, and control assessment
  • Recommended target state and intervention
  • Bounded implementation scope and decision gates

A build proceeds only through a separate go/no-go decision.

01

Decision & Evidence

Define the operating or management decision, current workflow, economic stakes, source evidence, accountable owner, and conditions for success.

02

Recommendation & Scope

Select the right intervention and map integrations, methods, permissions, failure modes, human review, and lifecycle requirements. Produce a bounded architecture and commercial scope.

03

Build & Integrate

Build against representative customer data and connect the actual systems, rules, and interfaces required for the operating workflow.

04

Validate & Handoff

Test against agreed criteria, document known limits, deploy monitoring, train the operating owner, and hand over source code and runbooks.

Vendor-neutral.
Architecture-specific.

We work within the customer environment and select components for the data, control, operating, and lifecycle requirements.

Deployment Environments

Microsoft Azure Google Cloud AWS Hybrid Local

Data & Intelligence

Enterprise APIs & SQL Frontier & local models RAG & agentic systems Relational & vector data

Delivery & Analysis

Microsoft Power Platform Python Optimization & geospatial APIs & containers Testing & observability

Rick Wilson

Founder, VaultIntel

I build decision systems for industries I have spent a career operating in: energy, industrials, sustainable materials, regulated operations, and enterprise finance. The work starts with the operating and economic decision, then applies the right data architecture, analysis, automation, and AI.

A PhD in chemical engineering and an MBA in finance from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business provide an unusual vantage point: I can sit in the architecture review and the board meeting. I have led refinery research, engineering, supply chain, business development, industrial startups, and sustainability programs.

Engagements are bounded and accountable. Clear scope, documented controls, working software, and an explicit handoff.

Technical depth Architecture review
Executive judgment Board meeting
Consulting
SAF carbon intensity, 45Q/45Z tax credits, NMTC capital structuring
CSO
Sustainable organics management, advancing SB 1383 compliance infrastructure
VP
Major integrated oil company, refinery research, engineering and supply chain
CEO
Venture-backed biotech startups, biochemicals and soil amendments, Silicon Valley
Chairman
Food & ag technology portfolio company
SVP
Growth equity portfolio company, business development

Methods connected to material decisions

Anonymized examples from industrial development, operations, and applied engineering.

01 /

Integrated CI, Incentive & Value-in-Use System

A first-of-kind low-carbon pathway cannot be evaluated in disconnected engineering, carbon, policy, market, and financial models.

A reproducible Python-to-Excel decision chain links process basis, life-cycle carbon, incentive logic, utility and CHP scenarios, market value, and capital cases. Controlled versions and generated review outputs maintain one assumption trail from engineering through the investment gate.

Python Excel model generation CI / LCA 45Z · 45Q · LCFS · RIN Value-in-use Stage-gate decisions
02 /

Industrial Formulation Optimizer

Variable ingredient assays, delivered prices, availability, and product specifications create a constrained formulation problem that static recipes cannot solve.

A deployed, tenant-isolated linear-programming service identifies the lowest delivered-cost feasible blend, explains binding constraints, and produces a traceable result for operating review. Customer assays, prices, formulations, and identities remain segregated.

Python Linear programming Tenant isolation Constraint diagnostics Streamlit
03 / FEL-1 PILOT

Vision-to-Engineering Feed Composition Pipeline

Feedstock composition arrives as photographs and irregular source material, while engineering models require structured inputs with visible provenance and uncertainty.

This FEL-1 pilot converts images into provenance-tagged composition estimates and a replayable engineering workbook. It records source files, model inputs, uncertainty, and calculation lineage; laboratory validation remains a gate before design use.

Computer vision Mass balance Workbook generation Provenance Uncertainty controls

Discuss a business problem.

Bring the decision, workflow, data constraints, and economic stakes. We will determine whether a Decision Workflow Assessment is warranted.

If AI is not the right method, we will say so. A smaller rules, data, or optimization system may be the better answer.

Best fit: bounded, high-value systems with an accountable owner and a clear operating or management decision. Engagements are scoped, documented, and handed over.

For the first email, describe the decision and constraints without confidential, regulated, or export-controlled information. We can establish an appropriate exchange process before reviewing sensitive material.

Email: hello@vaultintel.io Availability: ● Select engagements now · Full launch Q1 2027 Location: Remote · US-based